A few years ago, scenes of ‘Sgt. Pepper’ spraying
protestors with pepper spray dominated Canadian news. There was an APEC
conference held in Vancouver and the protestors were voicing (and more)
their concerns over the concentration of power and control by
multinational companies. The next year, the ‘Battle in Seattle’ raged as
protestors demonstrated against globalization of the economies at the
World Trade Organization Economic Summit. While the Atlantic Aquaculture
and Exposition went without a hitch this year, save for the few who
demonstrated the right to sleep where they fell, it would be a mistake
to think that fish farming will not garner the attention of
anti-globalization efforts.
In a recent workshop sponsored by the Canadian Aquaculture Institute
and hosted by Aquatic Health SA (Chile), it was noted that domestic
production of Chilean eggs would be 350 million (unconfirmed) and that
importation of eyed eggs would be 50 million. Granted, these eggs are
from three species and the importations are spread out over several
months. However, mathematically, this represents at least 5,000 spawning
broodstock females. Consider that spawning efficiency is 90%, males are
also needed at a ratio of about 1:2 and Coho give far fewer eggs than
Atlantic salmon. This means that somewhere in the world, singularly or
collectively, there is about 10,000 broodstock swimming about with the
name ‘CHILE’ stamped on them.
Chile is not alone in this regard. In all the salmon-producing
countries of the world, seed stocks have been introduced to propagate
the industry. Nor is salmon alone. It is hard to imagine a bacon and egg
breakfast without domestic production of swine and poultry. Every
agri-industry relies on sources of seed stock.
Similar to the salmonid situation, the halibut, turbot, cod and
sturgeon industries have relied on foreign sources of seed to start the
industry. Issues of introduction of non-indigenous species aside, some
people have concerns that the introduction of seed stocks may be a
multinational ploy to consolidate power and control. This consolidation
of control is viewed as an avenue to escape high labour costs,
environmental legislation or local tax laws. The reality is far less
sinister.
In
every country where salmon is now grown, it has started out at the
grass-roots or national level and was cued by the diminishing returns
from wild harvest. As the supply of wild salmon decreased, the demand
increased which, in turn, increased prices.. At high prices, starting a
farm seems like a good idea; and it was.
Early farming had problems with disease, continuity of supply,
consistent product quality and market stability. Take this as reading
‘Cash Flow’. Those with the cash went with the flow and in a few years,
there were fewer players, but those players were bigger, more efficient
and profitable. In effect, the larger companies were those that had the
experienced people and the best locations. These assets are not to be
underestimated.
In parallel to the regional or national farming situation, the story
continues on the international stage. Salmon is now a commodity that
(hopefully) has seen the price bottom out. This economic stress has
meant that companies with diverse interests, deep pockets and
experienced people survived. The natural action is to grow by
acquisition and merger to preserve the continuity of supply, spread
regional or national risk and optimize the company infrastructure and
experience. Further, who can afford to buy a mega-farming company other
than another mega-farming company?
This rather simplistic explanation of the multinational face to salmon
farming has profound implications to broodstock management for two main
reasons. First, experts got to be experts by doing what they do well. If
this includes a species or strain of fish, the corporate body will
continue with the practice and gravitate towards the product in the
companies’ portfolio. A case in point is the acquisition of a Chilean
national company by a Norwegian concern. The new owners changed
production species from Coho to Atlantics. This is the area of their
expertise. The change was done in advance of the bottom falling out of
the Japanese Coho market, but only soon enough to cushion the blow. In
any event, the change of species put considerable demands on seed supply
for Atlantic salmon in Chile and the demand for Atlantic eggs was
intensified.
Second, different growing and culture conditions call for different
strains of fish. Some fish do better in certain environmental conditions
or are best suited for marketing considerations. The only way to access
these stocks is to import them. This means that the latent economic
effect of growing broodstock resides in another country.
As a secondary effect of importing eggs, there is a serious health
consideration with the importation of seed. The risk of importing
disease can not be completely ruled out, but the risk can be minimized.
Less than 10 inhabitants now occupy the international salmon world.
Globalization of the art has meant great advances in the technology of
rearing fish through cross-pollination. Prices will be more stable and
companies will feel less pain through diversified risk. Further, the
economic benefits to rural communities and business centers alike can
not be understated. Another added benefit of multinational ownership is
the standardization of salmon farming practices. These must match the
most stringent of national needs and are often accepted globally within
a company. The other side of the coin is pressures on the ground floor
workers who have to care for the broodstock fish and ensure a top
quality supply of seed, no matter where it will be grown.