Search for product price information
Announcement:   2008 Fun Run at the Aquaculture Pacific Exchange in Campbell River

 

New TMS Sizes

 2008 Catalogue

  Aquaculture Products
  Spawning Products
  International Agents
  What's New
  Place an Order
  Site Search
  About Us
  Links
  e-mail Us
  Home
 


In the USA contact:

Excerpts from Induced and Synchronized Spawning of Captive Broodstock Using Ovaplant and Ovaprim by J.F.F. Powell, J. Brackett and J.A. Battaglia published in Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada, Bull. Aquacul. Assoc. Canada, 98-3. The complete document can be obtained from the Aquaculture Association of Canada, PO Box 1987, St. Andrews, NB, Canada E0G 2X0.

Induced and Synchronized Spawning

of Captive Broodstock

Using Ovaplant and Ovaprim

J. F. F. Powell, J. Brackett, and J. A. Battaglia

 

In a large population of salmon, maturation occurs at different rates and fish spawn at different times. In some cases, spawning within a group of fish may occur over several months. In these fish, it would be a distinct advantage to synchronize and compress the spawning season. In other circumstances, it is desirable to have some fish in a population mature ahead of others. The ability to advance maturation provides greater flexibility in the hatchery and with seawater entry dates of smolts. As well, early gametes permit the out-crossing of different strains. With regard to alternate species, several obstacles to research and development could be overcome if fish spawned in a predictable fashion. Under ESC (Health Canada) approval we have developed a method to advance and synchronize maturation in captive broodstock. In controlled studies and trials conducted in British Columbia, New Brunswick and Chile, coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), chinook (0. tshawytscha) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), trout (0. mykiss) and sablefish (Anoplopomafimbria) were induced to mature using peptide implants. In treated coho salmon, spawning dates were significantly (P<0.05) advanced, the spawning season was shortened, milt quality was increased and fry reached first feeding earlier. In several trials, this method has proven both effective and safe for humans and fish. The implications of this technology for producers are profound in the development of a broodstock management programme.

 

Introduction

Several methods are available to induce maturation in captive fishes, including injection of gonadotropin hormones (GTH), pituitary extracts containing GTH,(') human chorionic GTH, and gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRH). All these methods either supply GTH, or GTH-like peptides, or elicit the liberation of native GTHs from the pituitary which then induce maturation.(') Recently, hypothalamic hormones such as native GnRI1 or their analogues have gained favour among commercial fish producers. GnRH peptides are smaller, easier to prepare, and are more effective at inducing maturation than other peptides. Because they are naturally occurring peptides that use the endocrine pathways of the fish, they are more reliable and potent without causing harmful side effects. As well, analogues of both the mammalian and salmon GnRH (sGnRHa) forms are more potent and degrade slower than natural hormones. (3)

Methods for administration of GnRH peptides to fish include topical absorption,(') injection of soluble GnRH in vehicle, intubation,0) or a sustained release preparation .(6) Of these methods, three are commonly used: saline solutions of GnRH (7) injection of commercial preparations that contain a salmon GnRH analogue such as Ovaprim(l) or sustained released pellets (6) (Ovaplant; Syndel Laboratories, Vancouver). Pure synthetic GnR14 analogues have been on the commercial market for over a decade, but require field preparation and refrigeration to prevent degradation. Preparations such as Ovaprim or Ovaplant are preferred because of handling and storage considerations without loss of efficacy.

In a study to demonstrate the efficacy of induced maturation using liquid injectable sGnRHa or implants that contain sGnRHa, coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) were either injected with Ovaprim, implanted with Ovaplant, or administered both treatments. To determine species differences, rainbow trout (0. mykiss) were treated with Ovaplant to induce spawning. The objectives of this study were to determine whether treatment to induce spawning causes an increase in prespawn mortality, advances spawning date, compresses the spawning season, or has any deleterious effect on the progeny. The study was conducted under controlled conditions and in a commercial production setting.  


Discussion

Fish treated with either Ovaplant andlor Ovaprim spawned in advance of control fish. Eggs and larvae from treated groups had similar survival and growth as those from control stocks. This demonstrates there is no latent effect of treatment on gamete viability. As such, this represents a significant advantage to freshwater culture operations. The reduced residency of spawning fish in freshwater decreases the potential of disease transmission to the current and subsequent generations by removing a pool of potential pathogens and decreases the need for therapeutant use. Advanced spawning also permits hatcheries to take advantage of warmer water temperatures which in turn promotes better growth and feed conversion in offspring.

Table 5. Days to first feeding from treatment and from spawning, and duration of first feeding for coho salmon fry from the start of spawning.

Group

Time from Spawning to First Feeding (days)

Time from Treatment to First Feeding (days)

Duration of First Feeding (days)

1

65

75

5

2

66

73

8

3

67

83

10

4

71

96

19

5

72

106

23

The treatments also compressed the spawning season. That is, the duration of the spawning season within the treated groups was less than in the control groups. In the case of trout, spawning was complete by the time the control fish had begun to spawn. This was also the case in coho where the spawning season for treated groups averaged five days compared to 15 days for control fish. A compressed spawning season provides considerable economic advantage as it decreases the amount of time crews must attend adult fish.

Batch spawning of fish also pen-nits batch ponding and first feeding of fry as exemplified by the current study. This results in more uniform growth of fish within a population by decreasing the duration of the first feeding phase. Uniformity in the size of fish is desired because it reduces the need for husbandry practices such as grading and mixing sizes of feeds. It is commonly thought that smolts of a uniform size also perform better in seawater than smolts of varied sizes.

This study has shown that induced maturation and coordinated spawning is a valuable tool for fish culturists. Firstly, the study indicates that greater efficiencies in hatchery operations are possible with regard to operational and capital costs. These savings are realized both immediately with adult fish and later with juvenile production. Secondly, there are implications for fish health as the freshwater residency period of adult fish is reduced; hence the use of therapeutants and the potential for horizontal transmission of disease is reduced. Thirdly, the genetic potential of broodstock can be maximized. By controlling the date of spawning, a greater number of viable gametes can be introduced into the breeding programme. As well, these techniques permit the out crossing of strains and the maximization of single-paired matings, In sum, advanced maturation helps maximize options in broodstock management.

References

  1. Zohar Y. 1989. In, Fish Culture in Warm Water Systems: Problems and Trends (M. Shilo, S Sairig, eds), p. 65-119. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  2. Crim LW, Sherwood NM, Wilson CE. 1998. Aquaculture 74: 87-95.
  3. Zohar Y, Goren A, Fridkin M, Koeh Y. 1990. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 79:306-331.
  4. Sherwood NM, Harvey B. 1986. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol, 61: 13~19.
  5. Solar II, McLean E, Baker IJ Sherwood NM, Donaldson EM. 1990. Fish Phys. Biochem. 8:497-499.
  6. Crim LW, Glebe BD. 1984. Aquaculture 43:47-56,
  7. Crim LW, Evans DM, Coy DH, Schally AV. 1981. Life Sci, 28:129-135.
  8. Powell JFF, Swanson P, Sherwood NM. 1995. Unpublished results (abstract in program of Amer. Fish. Soc,, Apr. 26-30, 1995, Victoria, BC).
 
 

All material, unless otherwise specified, is copyrighted by Syndel Laboratories Ltd., 1999-2008.


Website updated -  May 20, 2008

  Some elements of this website require Java to be enabled